On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 April 2012 19:35, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c | 158 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c >> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c >> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..603a63b >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ >> +/* { dg-do compile } */ >> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } >> { "-mcpu=iwmmxt" } } */ >> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-mabi=*" } >> { "-mabi=iwmmxt" } } */ >> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-march=*" >> } { "-march=iwmmxt" } } */ >> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to ARM mode" { arm*-*-* } { "-mthumb" } { >> "" } } */ > > How about simplifying this with a dg-require-effective-target > arm_arm_ok instead of doing > dg-require-effective-target arm32 and then skipping it for Thumb2 ?
I might not understand properly, but couldn't I just do this? /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_iwmmxt_ok } */ Thanks, Matt