On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 4 April 2012 19:35, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c |  158 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..603a63b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mmx-2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } 
>> { "-mcpu=iwmmxt" } } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-mabi=*" } 
>> { "-mabi=iwmmxt" } } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the iWMMXt" { arm*-*-* } { "-march=*" 
>> } { "-march=iwmmxt" } } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to ARM mode" { arm*-*-* } { "-mthumb" } { 
>> "" } } */
>
> How about simplifying this with a dg-require-effective-target
> arm_arm_ok instead of doing
> dg-require-effective-target arm32 and then skipping it for Thumb2 ?

I might not understand properly, but couldn't I just do this?

/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_iwmmxt_ok } */

Thanks,
Matt

Reply via email to