On Dec 11, 2023, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> @@ -20589,7 +20589,7 @@ allocation before or after interprocedural
>> optimization.
>> This option enables multilib-aware @code{TFLAGS} to be used to build
>> target libraries with options different from those the compiler is
>> configured to use by default, through the use of specs (@xref{Spec
>> -Files}) set up by compiler internals, by the target, or by builders at
>> +Files}.) set up by compiler internals, by the target, or by builders at
> The proper change in this context is to use @pxref instead of @xref.
Oooh, nice! Thank you!
Here's a presumably proper fix on top of the earlier one, then. Tested
on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok to install?
Rather than a dubious fix for a dubious warning, namely adding a
period after a parenthesized @xref because the warning demands it, use
@pxref that is meant for exactly this case. Thanks to Joseph Myers
for introducing me to it.
for gcc/ChangeLog
* doc/invoke.texi (multiflags): Drop extraneous period, use
@pxref instead.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 7d15cf94821e3..ce4bb025d5144 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -20588,8 +20588,8 @@ allocation before or after interprocedural optimization.
@item -fmultiflags
This option enables multilib-aware @code{TFLAGS} to be used to build
target libraries with options different from those the compiler is
-configured to use by default, through the use of specs (@xref{Spec
-Files}.) set up by compiler internals, by the target, or by builders at
+configured to use by default, through the use of specs (@pxref{Spec
+Files}) set up by compiler internals, by the target, or by builders at
configure time.
Like @code{TFLAGS}, this allows the target libraries to be built for
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
