Arnaud Charlet wrote: >> Also note: the line numbers listed below work for me with yesterday's >> up-to-date trunk, but if you want to use these commands, you should rerun >> the commands above so that the line numbers reflect your actual sources. >> ) >> >> This is just a heads up. >> I'm not volunteering to make these changes. > > FWIW, there are many false positives on the gcc/ada directory (missing > Ada specific notions and acronyms). A few real typo fixes also of course, > but the ratio does not look very good.
In any list of that size, at least a few are guaranteed to be false positives. That's why I wrote this part: > (Note that these sed commands are just suggestions that do not take > into account any context ... The figure of 1500+ was rounded down from the actual total of 1586 suggestions. Eliminating the FPs matching /TJE|TEH|STPO|withing/i reduces that to 1501.