Hi, Han.

It's awesome that some one want to optimize dynamic LMUL feature of GCC.

I knew this feature is not stable yet and I failed to find the time to optimize 
it (Still busy with fixing bugs).

Could you give me more details why this patch can refine those 2 cases with 
picking larger LMUL (I am happy with those 2 cases be changed as using larger 
LMUL )?

It seems this patch is ignoring the first vectorized statement during the live 
calculation ?

Thanks. 



juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
 
From: demin.han
Date: 2023-12-20 16:15
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; pan2...@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix calculation of max live vregs
For the stmt _1 = _2 + _3, assume that _2 or _3 not used after this stmt.
_1 can use same register with _2 or _3 if without early clobber.
Two registers are needed, but current calculation is three.
 
This patch preserves point 0 for bb entry and excludes its def when
calculates live regs of certain point.
 
Signed-off-by: demin.han <demin....@starfivetech.com>
 
gcc/ChangeLog:
 
* config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc (max_number_of_live_regs): Fix 
max live vregs calc
(preferred_new_lmul_p): Ditto
 
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
 
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul2-7.c: Moved to...
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-10.c: ...here.
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-4.c: Moved to...
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-11.c: ...here.
 
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc                 | 10 +++++-----
.../rvv/{dynamic-lmul2-7.c => dynamic-lmul4-10.c}      |  6 +++---
.../rvv/{dynamic-lmul4-4.c => dynamic-lmul8-11.c}      |  6 +++---
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
rename gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/{dynamic-lmul2-7.c => 
dynamic-lmul4-10.c} (79%)
rename gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/{dynamic-lmul4-4.c => 
dynamic-lmul8-11.c} (87%)
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc 
b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
index e7bc9ed5233..a316603e207 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-costs.cc
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ compute_local_program_points (
       /* Collect the stmts that is vectorized and mark their program point.  */
       for (i = 0; i < nbbs; i++)
{
-   int point = 0;
+   int point = 1;
  basic_block bb = bbs[i];
  vec<stmt_point> program_points = vNULL;
  if (dump_enabled_p ())
@@ -300,13 +300,13 @@ max_number_of_live_regs (const basic_block bb,
   unsigned int i;
   unsigned int live_point = 0;
   auto_vec<unsigned int> live_vars_vec;
-  live_vars_vec.safe_grow_cleared (max_point + 1, true);
+  live_vars_vec.safe_grow_cleared (max_point, true);
   for (hash_map<tree, pair>::iterator iter = live_ranges.begin ();
        iter != live_ranges.end (); ++iter)
     {
       tree var = (*iter).first;
       pair live_range = (*iter).second;
-      for (i = live_range.first; i <= live_range.second; i++)
+      for (i = live_range.first + 1; i <= live_range.second; i++)
{
  machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (var));
  unsigned int nregs
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ update_local_live_ranges (
      if (!program_points_per_bb.get (e->src))
continue;
      unsigned int max_point
- = (*program_points_per_bb.get (e->src)).length () - 1;
+ = (*program_points_per_bb.get (e->src)).length ();
      live_range = live_ranges->get (def);
      if (!live_range)
continue;
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ preferred_new_lmul_p (loop_vec_info other_loop_vinfo)
{
  basic_block bb = (*iter).first;
  unsigned int max_point
-     = (*program_points_per_bb.get (bb)).length () - 1;
+     = (*program_points_per_bb.get (bb)).length () + 1;
  if ((*iter).second.is_empty ())
    continue;
  /* We prefer larger LMUL unless it causes register spillings.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul2-7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-10.c
similarity index 79%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul2-7.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-10.c
index 636332dbb62..74e629168f8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul2-7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-10.c
@@ -17,10 +17,10 @@ bar (int *x, int a, int b, int n)
   return sum1 + sum2;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {e32,m2} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {e32,m4} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {jr} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {ret} 2 } } *
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 8" 1 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 4" 1 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Maximum lmul = 2" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Maximum lmul = 4" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Maximum lmul = 2" "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Maximum lmul = 1" "vect" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-4.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-11.c
similarity index 87%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-4.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-11.c
index 01a359bc7c8..01c976dd67b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul4-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-11.c
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ void foo2 (int64_t *__restrict a,
     }
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {e64,m4} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {e64,m8} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 8" 1 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Maximum lmul = 4" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Maximum lmul = 8" "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Maximum lmul = 4" "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Maximum lmul = 2" "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Maximum lmul = 1" "vect" } } */
-- 
2.43.0
 
 

Reply via email to