OK. Sounds reasonable. But from my side, I used to commit patches after full coverage testing.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Jeff Law Date: 2023-12-21 11:28 To: 钟居哲; cooper.joshua; gcc-patches CC: jim.wilson.gcc; palmer; andrew; philipp.tomsich; Christoph Müllner; jinma; Cooper Qu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] RISC-V: Support XTheadVector extension On 12/20/23 16:08, 钟居哲 wrote: > Btw, rv32/rv64gc or rv32/rv64 gcv testing is not enough. > > We need full coverage testing, since we always commit patch after no > regression testing on full coverage testing: No. It is unreasonable to require this large of test matrix for the vast majority if contributions. thead should be able to pick a reasonable set that provides a degree of coverage, but they don't need to test all those configurations. jeff
