On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 11:44 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > > 在 2023/12/21 下午8:00, chenglulu 写道: > > Sorry, I've been busy with something else these two days. I don't > > think there's anything wrong with the code, > > > > but I need to test the spec.:-) > > Hi, Ruoyao: > > After applying this patch, spec2006 464.h264 ref will have a 6.4% > performance drop. So I'm going to retest it.
I think 6.4% is large enough not to be a random error. Is there an example showing the code regression? And I'm wondering if keeping the peephole besides the new define_insn_and_split produces a better result instead of solely relying on define_insn_and_split? -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
