Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com> writes:
> With new glibc one more loop can be vectorized via simd exp in libmvec.
>
> Found by the Linaro TCWG CI.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gfortran/vect/vect-8.f90: Accept more vectorized loops.
OK. At first I thought it would be good to "defend" the increase when
it's supposed to apply, but it would need a relatively complicated check,
and there should be plenty of test coverage elsewhere.
Thanks,
Richard
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
> b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
> index ca72ddcffca..938dfc29754 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
> @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ CALL track('KERNEL ')
> RETURN
> END SUBROUTINE kernel
>
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 25 loops" 1 "vect" { target
> aarch64_sve } } }
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 24 loops" 1 "vect" { target
> { aarch64*-*-* && { ! aarch64_sve } } } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2\[56\] loops" 1 "vect" {
> target aarch64_sve } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2\[45\] loops" 1 "vect" {
> target { aarch64*-*-* && { ! aarch64_sve } } } } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2\[234\] loops" 1 "vect" {
> target { vect_intdouble_cvt && { ! aarch64*-*-* } } } } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 17 loops" 1 "vect" { target
> { { ! vect_intdouble_cvt } && { ! aarch64*-*-* } } } } }
