On 1/2/24 12:41, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
gccint recommends using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL in
ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME, but many implementations use
ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL instead. It's inconsistent and prevents changes to
ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL from affecting the respective targets.
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 2 +-
gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc | 5 ++---
gcc/config/arm/aout.h | 2 +-
gcc/config/arm/arm.cc | 2 +-
gcc/config/bfin/bfin.h | 16 ++++++++--------
gcc/config/c6x/c6x.h | 2 +-
gcc/config/gcn/gcn.cc | 5 ++---
gcc/config/h8300/h8300.h | 2 +-
gcc/config/ia64/ia64.cc | 5 ++---
gcc/config/mcore/mcore-elf.h | 2 +-
gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.cc | 3 +--
gcc/config/mips/mips.cc | 19 ++++++++++---------
gcc/config/pa/pa.cc | 3 ++-
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 2 +-
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 4 ++--
15 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
Essentially none of these ports define ASM_OUTPUT_FUCNTION_LABEL and the
fallback just uses ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL under the hood. So this should have
no functional change. OK for the trunk.
jeff
