On 1/2/24 14:07, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/1/24 20:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Tested mmix-knuth-mmixware (where all torture-variants of
gcc.dg/torture/inline-mem-cpy-1.c now pass) and native
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also stepped through the test for native,
w/wo. RUN_FRACTION defined to see that it worked as intended.
You may wonder what about the "sibling" tests inline-mem-cmp-1.c and
inline-mem-cpy-cmp-1.c. Well, they FAIL, but not because of
timeouts(!) To be continued....
Ok to commit?
Or, other suggestions?
I'm pretty sure there's already a target selector for "simulator" So you
might be able to do this automagically with somethign like
dg-additional-options "-DRUN_FRACTION=11" { target { simulator } }"
Or something close to that.
Hm... But that's exactly what the one-line patch to
gcc.dg/torture/inline-mem-cpy-1.c looked like, last in the
submitted commit. I had to double-check my sent-mail folder
that I didn't miss that part. :)
I'm mostly worried about the patch to gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c.
Does that mean all-ok?
Yea, sorry. Not sure why it didn't register in my brain.
Yes, this was all OK.
jeff
