Recent commit introduced a conditional branch in eh_return epilogues
that is not compatible with speculation tracking:

  commit 426fddcbdad6746fe70e031f707fb07f55dfb405
  Author:     Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com>
  CommitDate: 2023-11-27 15:52:48 +0000

  aarch64: Use br instead of ret for eh_return

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR target/112987
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_expand_epilogue): Use
        explicit compare and separate jump with speculation tracking.
---
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index e6bd3fd0bb4..e6de62dc02a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -9879,7 +9879,17 @@ aarch64_expand_epilogue (rtx_call_insn *sibcall)
         is just as correct as retaining the CFA from the body
         of the function.  Therefore, do nothing special.  */
       rtx label = gen_label_rtx ();
-      rtx x = gen_rtx_EQ (VOIDmode, EH_RETURN_TAKEN_RTX, const0_rtx);
+      rtx x;
+      if (aarch64_track_speculation)
+       {
+         /* Emit an explicit compare, so cc can be tracked.  */
+         rtx cc_reg = aarch64_gen_compare_reg (EQ,
+                                               EH_RETURN_TAKEN_RTX,
+                                               const0_rtx);
+         x = gen_rtx_EQ (GET_MODE (cc_reg), cc_reg, const0_rtx);
+       }
+      else
+       x = gen_rtx_EQ (VOIDmode, EH_RETURN_TAKEN_RTX, const0_rtx);
       x = gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, x,
                                gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (Pmode, label), pc_rtx);
       rtx jump = emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pc_rtx, x));
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to