on 2024/1/27 06:42, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:43 PM Kewen.Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As pointed out by the discussion in PR109705, the current
>> vect_long_mult effective target check on Power is broken.
>> This patch is to fix it accordingly.
>>
>> With additional change by adding a guard vect_long_mult
>> in gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c , it's tested well on Power{8,9}
>> LE & BE (also on Power10 LE as before).
>
> I see this is still broken for 32bit PowerPC where vect_long_mult
> should return true still since long there is 32bit and there is a
> 32bit vector multiply.
> Can someone test (and apply if approved) the attached patch to see if
> it fixes pr25413a.c for powerpc*-*-* for 32bit?
Thanks for fixing, it works perfectly as tested.
I just pushed it as r14-8485 (also updating with a tab and commit log).
BR,
Kewen
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
>>
>> I'm going to push this soon.
>>
>> BR,
>> Kewen
>> -----
>> PR testsuite/109705
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_long_mult):
>> Fix powerpc*-*-* checks.
>> ---
>> gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> index 81ae92a0266..fac32fb3d0e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>> @@ -9073,9 +9073,9 @@ proc check_effective_target_vect_int_mult { } {
>>
>> proc check_effective_target_vect_long_mult { } {
>> if { [istarget i?86-*-*] || [istarget x86_64-*-*]
>> - || (([istarget powerpc*-*-*]
>> - && ![istarget powerpc-*-linux*paired*])
>> - && [check_effective_target_ilp32])
>> + || ([istarget powerpc*-*-*]
>> + && [check_effective_target_powerpc_vsx_ok]
>> + && [check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr10])
>> || [is-effective-target arm_neon]
>> || ([istarget sparc*-*-*] && [check_effective_target_ilp32])
>> || [istarget aarch64*-*-*]
>> --
>> 2.39.1
