* Jonathan Wakely:

>>+<p>To fix the remaining <code>int</code>-conversions issues, add casts
>>+to an appropriate pointer or integer type.  On GNU systems, the
>>+standard (but generally optional) types
>
> I know what you mean here, but I'm not sure the parenthesis adds
> clarity for anybody who doesn't already know that those types are
> optional for conformance. I think they're supported for all targets
> that GCC supports, so maybe just omit the parenthesis.

Fair enough, I've droped the parentheses.  Thank you for your other
suggestions as well, I have applied them.

Florian

Reply via email to