Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > "Maciej W. Rozycki" <ma...@orcam.me.uk> writes: > >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> >>> > There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; cf. >>> > <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588296.html>. >>> >>> Do you have something you can show for this? Maybe in a PR? >> >> I have filed no PRs as I didn't assess the collateral damage at the time >> I looked at it. I only ran regression-testing with `-mlra' shortly after >> I completed MODE_CC conversion and added the option, to see what lies >> beyond. And I only added `-mlra' and made minimal changes to make the >> compiler build again just to make it easier to proceed towards LRA. > > I think before moving forward with the plan in general, a PR is ideally > needed for each target anyway. Not all machine maintainers actively watch the > MLs.
I have now started doing this in PR113932. > > [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
