This looks like an oversight of handling DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE.
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE only has the u.s_number.number set while
the code expected newc.u.s_binary.left would be valid.
So this treats DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE like we treat function paramaters
(DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_FUNCTION_PARAM) and template paramaters 
(DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM).

Note the code in the demangler does this when it sets 
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE:
      ret->type = DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE;
      ret->u.s_number.number = num;

Committed as obvious after bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu
Will commit to other branches in a few days.

        PR tree-optimization/109804

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (new_delete_mismatch_p): Handle
        DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C: New test.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
---
 gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc                 |  1 +
 .../g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C    | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
index cd083ab2237..dedaae27b31 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
@@ -1701,6 +1701,7 @@ new_delete_mismatch_p (const demangle_component &newc,
 
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_FUNCTION_PARAM:
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM:
+    case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE:
       return newc.u.s_number.number != delc.u.s_number.number;
 
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CHARACTER:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0ddc056c6df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/109804 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wall" } */
+
+/* Here we used to ICE in new_delete_mismatch_p because
+   we didn't handle unnamed types from the demangler 
(DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE). */
+
+template <typename T, typename ARGS>
+static inline T * construct_at(void *at, ARGS && args)
+{
+ struct Placeable : T
+ {
+  Placeable(ARGS && args) : T(args) { }
+  void * operator new (long unsigned int, void *ptr) { return ptr; }
+  void operator delete (void *, void *) { }
+ };
+ return new (at) Placeable(static_cast<ARGS &&>(args));
+}
+template <typename MT>
+struct Reconstructible
+{
+  char _space[sizeof(MT)];
+  Reconstructible() { }
+};
+template <typename MT>
+struct Constructible : Reconstructible<MT>
+{
+ Constructible(){}
+};
+struct A { };
+struct B
+{
+ Constructible<A> a { };
+ B(int) { }
+};
+Constructible<B> b { };
+void f()
+{
+  enum { ENUM_A = 1 };
+  enum { ENUM_B = 1 };
+  construct_at<B>(b._space, ENUM_B);
+}
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to