LGTM. But please commit it with adding [NFC] into the title of this patch:

RISC-V: Refactor expand_vec_cmp [NFC]
 
 
------------------ Original ------------------
From: &nbsp;"demin.han"<demin....@starfivetech.com&gt;;
Date: &nbsp;Fri, Mar 1, 2024 02:27 PM
To: &nbsp;"gcc-patches"<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org&gt;; 
Cc: &nbsp;"juzhe.zhong"<juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai&gt;; 
"kito.cheng"<kito.ch...@gmail.com&gt;; "Li, Pan2"<pan2...@intel.com&gt;; 
"jeffreyalaw"<jeffreya...@gmail.com&gt;; 
Subject: &nbsp;[PATCH 2/5] RISC-V: Refactor expand_vec_cmp

&nbsp;

There are two expand_vec_cmp functions.
They have same structure and similar code.
We can use default arguments instead of overloading.

Tested on RV32 and RV64.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (expand_vec_cmp): Change proto
        * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (expand_vec_cmp): Use default arguments
        (expand_vec_cmp_float): Adapt arguments

Signed-off-by: demin.han <demin....@starfivetech.com&gt;
---
&nbsp;gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h |&nbsp; 2 +-
&nbsp;gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; | 44 
+++++++++++----------------------
&nbsp;2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
index 80efdf2b7e5..b8735593805 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ bool simm5_p (rtx);
&nbsp;bool neg_simm5_p (rtx);
&nbsp;#ifdef RTX_CODE
&nbsp;bool has_vi_variant_p (rtx_code, rtx);
-void expand_vec_cmp (rtx, rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
+void expand_vec_cmp (rtx, rtx_code, rtx, rtx, rtx = nullptr, rtx = nullptr);
&nbsp;bool expand_vec_cmp_float (rtx, rtx_code, rtx, rtx, bool);
&nbsp;void expand_cond_len_unop (unsigned, rtx *);
&nbsp;void expand_cond_len_binop (unsigned, rtx *);
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
index 0cfbd21ce6f..14e75b9a117 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
@@ -2752,7 +2752,8 @@ vectorize_related_mode (machine_mode vector_mode, 
scalar_mode element_mode,
&nbsp;/* Expand an RVV comparison.&nbsp; */
&nbsp;
&nbsp;void
-expand_vec_cmp (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx op1)
+expand_vec_cmp (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx mask,
+               rtx maskoff)
&nbsp;{
&nbsp;&nbsp; machine_mode mask_mode = GET_MODE (target);
&nbsp;&nbsp; machine_mode data_mode = GET_MODE (op0);
@@ -2762,8 +2763,8 @@ expand_vec_cmp (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx 
op1)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx lt = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx gt = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (lt, LT, op0, op1);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (gt, GT, op0, op1);
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (lt, LT, op0, op1, mask, 
maskoff);
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (gt, GT, op0, op1, mask, 
maskoff);
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; icode = code_for_pred (IOR, mask_mode);
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, lt, gt};
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, BINARY_MASK_OP, 
ops);
@@ -2771,33 +2772,16 @@ expand_vec_cmp (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx 
op1)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }
&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx cmp = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mask_mode, op0, op1);
-&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, cmp, op0, op1};
-&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, COMPARE_OP, ops);
-}
-
-void
-expand_vec_cmp (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx mask, rtx maskoff, rtx op0,
-               rtx op1)
-{
-&nbsp; machine_mode mask_mode = GET_MODE (target);
-&nbsp; machine_mode data_mode = GET_MODE (op0);
-&nbsp; insn_code icode = get_cmp_insn_code (code, data_mode);
-
-&nbsp; if (code == LTGT)
+&nbsp; if (!mask &amp;&amp; !maskoff)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx lt = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx gt = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (lt, LT, mask, maskoff, op0, 
op1);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (gt, GT, mask, maskoff, op0, 
op1);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; icode = code_for_pred (IOR, mask_mode);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, lt, gt};
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, BINARY_MASK_OP, ops);
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; return;
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, cmp, op0, op1};
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, COMPARE_OP, ops);
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }
+&nbsp; else
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, mask, maskoff, cmp, op0, 
op1};
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, COMPARE_OP_MU, ops);
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }
-
-&nbsp; rtx cmp = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mask_mode, op0, op1);
-&nbsp; rtx ops[] = {target, mask, maskoff, cmp, op0, op1};
-&nbsp; emit_vlmax_insn (icode, COMPARE_OP_MU, ops);
&nbsp;}
&nbsp;
&nbsp;/* Expand an RVV floating-point comparison:
@@ -2875,7 +2859,7 @@ expand_vec_cmp_float (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, 
rtx op1,
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; else
&nbsp;  {
&nbsp;  &nbsp; /* vmfeq.vv&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; v0, vb, vb, v0.t&nbsp; */
-       &nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (eq0, EQ, eq0, eq0, op1, op1);
+       &nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (eq0, EQ, op1, op1, eq0, eq0);
&nbsp;  }
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; break;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; default:
@@ -2893,7 +2877,7 @@ expand_vec_cmp_float (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, 
rtx op1,
&nbsp;&nbsp; if (code == ORDERED)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; emit_move_insn (target, eq0);
&nbsp;&nbsp; else
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (eq0, code, eq0, eq0, op0, op1);
+&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; expand_vec_cmp (eq0, code, op0, op1, eq0, eq0);
&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp; if (can_invert_p)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {
-- 
2.43.2

Reply via email to