Jørgen Kvalsvik <j...@lambda.is> writes: > Hi, > > I propose these fixes for the current issues with the condition > coverage. > > Rainer, I propose to simply delete the test with __sigsetjmp. I don't > think it actually detects anything reasonable any more, I kept it around > to prevent a regression. Since then I have built a lot of programs (with > optimization enabled) and not really seen this problem. > > H.J., the problem you found with -O2 was really a problem of > tree-inlining, which was actually caught earlier by Jan [1]. It probably > warrants some more testing, but I could reproduce by tuning your test > case to use always_inline and not -O2 and trigger the error. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/648785.html
I couldn't find your BZ account, but FWIW: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627. Thanks. > > Thanks, > Jørgen > > Jørgen Kvalsvik (2): > Remove unecessary and broken MC/DC compile test > Copy condition->expr map when inlining [PR114599] > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-19.c | 11 --------- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-pr114599.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++ > gcc/tree-inline.cc | 20 +++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-pr114599.c
