Hi!
OK to push the attached "GCN: Enable effective-target 'vect_long_long'"?
(Or is that not what you'd expect to see for GCN? I haven't checked the
actual back end code...)
Grüße
Thomas
>From d74cc9caadfe36652503782a8da172ae1975915c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tschwi...@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:10:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] GCN: Enable effective-target 'vect_long_long'
... as made apparent by a number of unexpectedly UNSUPPORTED test cases, which
now all turn into PASS, with just one exception:
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
..., which needs to be looked into, separately.
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_long_long):
Enable for GCN.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 594837653bb..1a8459561c6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -7692,7 +7692,8 @@ proc check_effective_target_vect_long_long { } {
|| ([istarget riscv*-*-*]
&& [check_effective_target_riscv_v])
|| ([istarget loongarch*-*-*]
- && [check_effective_target_loongarch_sx])}}]
+ && [check_effective_target_loongarch_sx])
+ || [istarget amdgcn-*-*] }}]
}
--
2.34.1
