> On Apr 19, 2024, at 16:54, Tom Tromey <t...@tromey.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> writes:
> 
>> +The size of the union is as if the flexiable array member were omitted
>> +except that it may have more trailing padding than the omission would imply.
>> +
>> +If all the members of a union are flexiable array member, the size of
> 
> There's a couple of spots that say "flexiable" which should say "flexible".

Thanks for catching those typo, I will fix them.

Qing
> 
> thanks,
> Tom

Reply via email to