Hi Pan,
I'm not sure I'm following. Did we miss something that should have been
covered? Like only an overlap on the srcs but not the dest?
Are there testcases that fail? If so we should definitely have one.
Can you give some additional information on why these reverts are needed?
+1 to the request for a failing testcase if there is one.Patrick
If something is broken then indeed we should revert it.
Yes, we may need to support these in gcc-15.
... why not just revert everything and xfail all the tests in a
follow up? Your patch is essentially a revert but doesn't look like
it. I'd rather we let a revert be a revert and adjust the tests
separately so it becomes clear.
Sure, will revert b3b2799b872 and then file the patch for the xfail tests.
Pan
