on 2024/4/22 17:35, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Ping? > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/593947.html > > > vec-mul is an execution test, but it only requires a powerpc_vsx_ok > effective target, which is enough only for compile tests. In order to > To check for runtime and execution environment support, we need to > require vsx_hw. Make that a condition for execution, but still > perform a compile test if the condition is not satisfied. > > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu. Also tested with > gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2. Ok to install? > > > for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c: Run on target vsx_hw, just > compile otherwise. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c > index bfcaf80719d1d..11da86159723f 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > -/* { dg-do run } */ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! vsx_hw } } } */ > +/* { dg-do run { target vsx_hw } } */ > /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
Nit: It's useless to check powerpc_vsx_ok for vsx_hw, so powerpc_vsx_ok check can be moved to be with ! vsx_hw. OK with this nit tweaked, thanks! BR, Kewen > /* { dg-options "-mvsx -O3" } */ > > >