on 2024/4/22 17:35, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Ping?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/593947.html
> 
> 
> vec-mul is an execution test, but it only requires a powerpc_vsx_ok
> effective target, which is enough only for compile tests.  In order to
> To check for runtime and execution environment support, we need to
> require vsx_hw.  Make that a condition for execution, but still
> perform a compile test if the condition is not satisfied.
> 
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu.  Also tested with
> gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2.  Ok to install?
> 
> 
> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c: Run on target vsx_hw, just
>       compile otherwise.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c
> index bfcaf80719d1d..11da86159723f 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mul.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! vsx_hw } } } */
> +/* { dg-do run { target vsx_hw } } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */

Nit: It's useless to check powerpc_vsx_ok for vsx_hw, so powerpc_vsx_ok check
can be moved to be with ! vsx_hw.

OK with this nit tweaked, thanks!

BR,
Kewen

>  /* { dg-options "-mvsx -O3" } */
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to