CC more RISC-V port people for awareness.

Pan

From: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 11:25 AM
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [pushed][PR114810][LRA]: Recognize alternatives with lack of 
available registers for insn and demote them.

Hi Vladimir,

Looks this patch results in some ICE in the rvv.exp of RISC-V backend, feel 
free to ping me if more information is needed for reproducing.

               ========= Summary of gcc testsuite =========
                            | # of unexpected case / # of unique unexpected case
                            |          gcc |          g++ |     gfortran |
    rv64gcv/  lp64d/ medlow | 1061 /    69 |    0 /     0 |      - |
make: *** [Makefile:1096: report-gcc-newlib] Error 1

Just pick one imm_loop_invariant-10.c as below.

/home/pli/gcc/111/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/imm_loop_invariant-10.c:20:1:
 error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 265 0 0 (parallel [
            (set (reg:RVVMF8QI 309 [239])
                (unspec:RVVMF8QI [
                        (reg:SI 0 zero)
                    ] UNSPEC_VUNDEF))
            (clobber (scratch:SI))
        ]) -1
     (nil))
during RTL pass: reload
…. gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/imm_loop_invariant-10.c:20:1: 
internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812
0xa9d309 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*)
........../.././gcc/gcc/rtl-error.cc:108
0xa9d32b _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*)
........../.././gcc/gcc/rtl-error.cc:116
0xa9bc07 extract_insn(rtx_insn*)
........../.././gcc/gcc/recog.cc:2812
0x10e5ad2 ira_remove_insn_scratches(rtx_insn*, bool, _IO_FILE*, rtx_def* 
(*)(rtx_def*))
........../.././gcc/gcc/ira.cc:5381
0x112868f remove_insn_scratches
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra.cc:2154
0x112868f lra_emit_move(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra.cc:513
0x1136883 match_reload
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra-constraints.cc:1184
0x1142ae4 curr_insn_transform
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra-constraints.cc:4778
0x11443cb lra_constraints(bool)
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra-constraints.cc:5481
0x112b192 lra(_IO_FILE*, int)
........../.././gcc/gcc/lra.cc:2442
0x10e0e7f do_reload
........../.././gcc/gcc/ira.cc:5973
0x10e0e7f execute
........../.././gcc/gcc/ira.cc:6161

Pan

From: Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com<mailto:vmaka...@redhat.com>>
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 12:40 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [pushed][PR114810][LRA]: Recognize alternatives with lack of available 
registers for insn and demote them.


The following patch is a fix for PR114810 from LRA side.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114810

The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86_64, aarch64, ppc64le.


Reply via email to