Thanks Andrew for comments, updated in v2.

Pan

From: Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; 钟居哲 <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; Kito 
Cheng <kito.ch...@gmail.com>; Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>; 
Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Match: Extract integer_types_ternary_match helper to 
avoid code dup [NFC]


On Sat, May 18, 2024, 9:17 PM <pan2...@intel.com<mailto:pan2...@intel.com>> 
wrote:
From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com<mailto:pan2...@intel.com>>

There are sorts of match pattern for SAT related cases,  there will be
some duplicated code to check the dest, op_0, op_1 are same tree types.
Aka ternary tree type matches.  Thus, extract one helper function to
do this and avoid match code duplication.

The below test suites are passed for this patch:
* The rv64gcv fully regression test.
* The x86 bootstrap test.
* The x86 regression test.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * generic-match-head.cc (integer_types_ternary_match): New helper
        function to check tenary tree type matches or not.
        * gimple-match-head.cc (integer_types_ternary_match): Ditto but
        for match.
        * match.pd: Leverage above helper function to avoid code dup.

Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com<mailto:pan2...@intel.com>>
---
 gcc/generic-match-head.cc | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/gimple-match-head.cc  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/match.pd              | 25 +++++--------------------
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/generic-match-head.cc b/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
index 0d3f648fe8d..cdd48c7a5cc 100644
--- a/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
+++ b/gcc/generic-match-head.cc
@@ -59,6 +59,23 @@ types_match (tree t1, tree t2)
   return TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (t1) == TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (t2);
 }

+/* Routine to determine if the types T1,  T2 and T3 are effectively
+   the same integer type for GENERIC.  If T1,  T2 or T3 is not a type,
+   the test applies to their TREE_TYPE.  */
+
+static inline bool
+integer_types_ternary_match (tree t1, tree t2, tree t3)
+{
+  t1 = TYPE_P (t1) ? t1 : TREE_TYPE (t1);
+  t2 = TYPE_P (t2) ? t2 : TREE_TYPE (t2);
+  t3 = TYPE_P (t3) ? t3 : TREE_TYPE (t3);
+
+  if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t1) || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t2) || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t3))
+    return false;
+
+  return types_match (t1, t2) && types_match (t1, t3);
+}
+
 /* Return if T has a single use.  For GENERIC, we assume this is
    always true.  */

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc b/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
index 5f8a1a1ad8e..91f2e56b8ef 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-match-head.cc
@@ -79,6 +79,23 @@ types_match (tree t1, tree t2)
   return types_compatible_p (t1, t2);
 }

+/* Routine to determine if the types T1,  T2 and T3 are effectively
+   the same integer type for GIMPLE.  If T1,  T2 or T3 is not a type,
+   the test applies to their TREE_TYPE.  */
+
+static inline bool
+integer_types_ternary_match (tree t1, tree t2, tree t3)
+{
+  t1 = TYPE_P (t1) ? t1 : TREE_TYPE (t1);
+  t2 = TYPE_P (t2) ? t2 : TREE_TYPE (t2);
+  t3 = TYPE_P (t3) ? t3 : TREE_TYPE (t3);
+
+  if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t1) || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t2) || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (t3))
+    return false;
+
+  return types_match (t1, t2) && types_match (t1, t3);
+}
+
 /* Return if T has a single use.  For GIMPLE, we also allow any
    non-SSA_NAME (ie constants) and zero uses to cope with uses
    that aren't linked up yet.  */
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 0f9c34fa897..b291e34bbe4 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3046,38 +3046,23 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
 /* Unsigned Saturation Add */
 (match (usadd_left_part_1 @0 @1)
  (plus:c @0 @1)
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))))
+ (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) && integer_types_ternary_match (type, @0, @1))))


Even though unsigned might be the cheaper check, you might need to swap the 
order back to where it was so you check integral first.

Otherwise this is nice cleanup. (Note I can't approve it though).

Thanks,
Andrew


 (match (usadd_left_part_2 @0 @1)
  (realpart (IFN_ADD_OVERFLOW:c @0 @1))
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))))
+ (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) && integer_types_ternary_match (type, @0, @1))))

 (match (usadd_right_part_1 @0 @1)
  (negate (convert (lt (plus:c @0 @1) @0)))
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))))
+ (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) && integer_types_ternary_match (type, @0, @1))))

 (match (usadd_right_part_1 @0 @1)
  (negate (convert (gt @0 (plus:c @0 @1))))
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))))
+ (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) && integer_types_ternary_match (type, @0, @1))))

 (match (usadd_right_part_2 @0 @1)
  (negate (convert (ne (imagpart (IFN_ADD_OVERFLOW:c @0 @1)) integer_zerop)))
- (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
-      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0))
-      && types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))))
+ (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) && integer_types_ternary_match (type, @0, @1))))

 /* We cannot merge or overload usadd_left_part_1 and usadd_left_part_2
    because the sub part of left_part_2 cannot work with right_part_1.
--
2.34.1

Reply via email to