Ajit Agarwal <aagar...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Hello Alex/Richard:
>
> Renaming of generic code is done to make target independent
> and target dependent code to support multiple targets.
>
> Target independent code is the Generic code with pure virtual function
> to interface betwwen target independent and dependent code.
>
> Target dependent code is the implementation of pure virtual function for
> aarch64 target and the call to target independent code.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Ajit
>
> aarch64: Further renaming of generic code
>
> Renaming of generic code is done to make target independent
> and target dependent code to support multiple targets.
>
> Target independent code is the Generic code with pure virtual function
> to interface betwwen target independent and dependent code.
>
> Target dependent code is the implementation of pure virtual function for
> aarch64 target and the call to target independent code.
>
> 2024-05-20 Ajit Kumar Agarwal <aagar...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc: Renaming of generic code
* config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc: Rename generic parts of code
to avoid "ldp" and "stp".
> ---
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-ldp-fusion.cc | 55 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
> @@ -1126,7 +1127,7 @@ struct stp_change_builder
>
> bool done () const { return m_state == state::DONE; }
>
> - stp_change_builder (insn_info *insns[2],
> + store_change_builder (insn_info *insns[2],
> insn_info *repurpose,
> insn_info *dest)
Please reindent the parameters for the new longer name.
> : m_state (state::FIRST), m_insns { insns[0], insns[1] },
> [...]
> @@ -1916,7 +1917,7 @@ fixup_debug_uses (obstack_watermark &attempt,
> // BASE gives the chosen base candidate for the pair and MOVE_RANGE is
> // a singleton range which says where to place the pair.
> bool
> -ldp_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> +pair_fusion_bb_info::fuse_pair (bool load_p,
> unsigned access_size,
> int writeback,
> insn_info *i1, insn_info *i2,
Same here.
> @@ -2687,7 +2688,7 @@ pair_fusion::get_viable_bases (insn_info *insns[2],
> // ACCESS_SIZE gives the (common) size of a single access, LOAD_P is true
> // if the accesses are both loads, otherwise they are both stores.
> bool
> -ldp_bb_info::try_fuse_pair (bool load_p, unsigned access_size,
> +pair_fusion_bb_info::try_fuse_pair (bool load_p, unsigned access_size,
> insn_info *i1, insn_info *i2)
> {
> if (dump_file)
And here.
OK with those changes, thanks.
Richard
