Here is a new version working also in C++98.

Note that I have this failure:

FAIL: 23_containers/vector/types/1.cc  -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

but it's already failing on master, my patch do not change anything.

Tested under Linux x64,

still ok to commit ?

François

On 24/05/2024 16:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 18:38, François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com> wrote:

On 23/05/2024 15:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/05/24 06:55 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
As explained in this email:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-April/058552.html

I experimented -Wfree-nonheap-object because of my enhancements on
algos.

So here is a patch to extend the usage of the _Guard type to other
parts of vector.
Nice, that fixes the warning you were seeing?
Yes ! I indeed forgot to say so :-)


We recently got a bug report about -Wfree-nonheap-object in
std::vector, but that is coming from _M_realloc_append which already
uses the RAII guard :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115016
Note that I also had to move call to __uninitialized_copy_a before
assigning this->_M_impl._M_start so get rid of the -Wfree-nonheap-object
warn. But _M_realloc_append is already doing potentially throwing
operations before assigning this->_M_impl so it must be something else.

Though it made me notice another occurence of _Guard in this method. Now
replaced too in this new patch.

      libstdc++: Use RAII to replace try/catch blocks

      Move _Guard into std::vector declaration and use it to guard all
calls to
      vector _M_allocate.

      Doing so the compiler has more visibility on what is done with the
pointers
      and do not raise anymore the -Wfree-nonheap-object warning.

      libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

              * include/bits/vector.tcc (_Guard): Move all the nested
duplicated class...
              * include/bits/stl_vector.h (_Guard_alloc): ...here.
              (_M_allocate_and_copy): Use latter.
              (_M_initialize_dispatch): Likewise and set _M_finish first
from the result
              of __uninitialize_fill_n_a that can throw.
              (_M_range_initialize): Likewise.

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
index 31169711a48..4ea74e3339a 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
@@ -1607,6 +1607,39 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       clear() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
       { _M_erase_at_end(this->_M_impl._M_start); }

+    private:
+      // RAII guard for allocated storage.
+      struct _Guard
If it's being defined at class scope instead of locally in a member
function, I think a better name would be good. Maybe _Ptr_guard or
_Dealloc_guard or something.
_Guard_alloc chosen.
+      {
+    pointer _M_storage;        // Storage to deallocate
+    size_type _M_len;
+    _Base& _M_vect;
+
+    _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+    _Guard(pointer __s, size_type __l, _Base& __vect)
+    : _M_storage(__s), _M_len(__l), _M_vect(__vect)
+    { }
+
+    _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+    ~_Guard()
+    {
+      if (_M_storage)
+        _M_vect._M_deallocate(_M_storage, _M_len);
+    }
+
+    _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+    pointer
+    _M_release()
+    {
+      pointer __res = _M_storage;
+      _M_storage = 0;
I don't think the NullablePointer requirements include assigning 0,
only from nullptr, which isn't valid in C++98.

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/named_req/NullablePointer

Please use _M_storage = pointer() instead.
I forgot about user fancy pointer, fixed.


+      return __res;
+    }
+
+      private:
+    _Guard(const _Guard&);
+      };
+
     protected:
       /**
        *  Memory expansion handler.  Uses the member allocation
function to
@@ -1618,18 +1651,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
     _M_allocate_and_copy(size_type __n,
                  _ForwardIterator __first, _ForwardIterator __last)
     {
-      pointer __result = this->_M_allocate(__n);
-      __try
-        {
-          std::__uninitialized_copy_a(__first, __last, __result,
-                      _M_get_Tp_allocator());
-          return __result;
-        }
-      __catch(...)
-        {
-          _M_deallocate(__result, __n);
-          __throw_exception_again;
-        }
+      _Guard __guard(this->_M_allocate(__n), __n, *this);
+      std::__uninitialized_copy_a
+        (__first, __last, __guard._M_storage, _M_get_Tp_allocator());
+      return __guard._M_release();
     }


@@ -1642,13 +1667,15 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       // 438. Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause
       template<typename _Integer>
     void
-    _M_initialize_dispatch(_Integer __n, _Integer __value, __true_type)
+    _M_initialize_dispatch(_Integer __int_n, _Integer __value,
__true_type)
     {
-      this->_M_impl._M_start = _M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(
-        static_cast<size_type>(__n), _M_get_Tp_allocator()));
-      this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage =
-        this->_M_impl._M_start + static_cast<size_type>(__n);
-      _M_fill_initialize(static_cast<size_type>(__n), __value);
Please fix the comment on _M_fill_initialize if you're removing the
use of it here.
Already done in this initial patch proposal, see below.

+      const size_type __n = static_cast<size_type>(__int_n);
+      _Guard __guard(_M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(
+        __n, _M_get_Tp_allocator())), __n, *this);
I think this would be easier to read if the _S_check_init_len call was
done first, and maybe the allocation too, since we are going to need a
local __start later anyway. So maybe like this:

   template<typename _Integer>
     void
     _M_initialize_dispatch(_Integer __ni, _Integer __value, __true_type)
     {
       const size_type __n = static_cast<size_type>(__ni);
       pointer __start = _M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(__n),
                                     _M_get_Tp_allocator());
       _Guard __guard(__start, __n, *this);
       this->_M_impl._M_start = __start;
       _M_fill_initialize(__n, __value);
       this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage = __start + __n;
       (void) __guard._M_release();
     }

Or inline the __uninitialized_fill_n_a call if you want to (but then
fix the comment on _M_fill_initialize). Inlining it does make this
function more consistent with the next one, which calls
__uninitialized_copy_a directly.
Yes, this is why I called __uninitialized_fill_n_a instead and also to
do so *before* assigning _M_impl._M_start.


-      // Called by the first initialize_dispatch above and by the
-      // vector(n,value,a) constructor.
+      // Called by the vector(n,value,a) constructor.
See, it's here :-)
Doh! Sorry, I'm not sure how I missed that.

Ok to commit ?
OK for trunk, thanks!
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h 
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
index 31169711a48..81fe3825064 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
@@ -1607,6 +1607,39 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       clear() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
       { _M_erase_at_end(this->_M_impl._M_start); }
 
+    private:
+      // RAII guard for allocated storage.
+      struct _Guard_alloc
+      {
+       pointer _M_storage;         // Storage to deallocate
+       size_type _M_len;
+       _Base& _M_vect;
+
+       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+       _Guard_alloc(pointer __s, size_type __l, _Base& __vect)
+       : _M_storage(__s), _M_len(__l), _M_vect(__vect)
+       { }
+
+       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+       ~_Guard_alloc()
+       {
+         if (_M_storage)
+           _M_vect._M_deallocate(_M_storage, _M_len);
+       }
+
+       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
+       pointer
+       _M_release()
+       {
+         pointer __res = _M_storage;
+         _M_storage = pointer();
+         return __res;
+       }
+
+      private:
+       _Guard_alloc(const _Guard_alloc&);
+      };
+
     protected:
       /**
        *  Memory expansion handler.  Uses the member allocation function to
@@ -1618,18 +1651,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
        _M_allocate_and_copy(size_type __n,
                             _ForwardIterator __first, _ForwardIterator __last)
        {
-         pointer __result = this->_M_allocate(__n);
-         __try
-           {
-             std::__uninitialized_copy_a(__first, __last, __result,
-                                         _M_get_Tp_allocator());
-             return __result;
-           }
-         __catch(...)
-           {
-             _M_deallocate(__result, __n);
-             __throw_exception_again;
-           }
+         _Guard_alloc __guard(this->_M_allocate(__n), __n, *this);
+         std::__uninitialized_copy_a
+           (__first, __last, __guard._M_storage, _M_get_Tp_allocator());
+         return __guard._M_release();
        }
 
 
@@ -1642,13 +1667,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       // 438. Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause
       template<typename _Integer>
        void
-       _M_initialize_dispatch(_Integer __n, _Integer __value, __true_type)
+       _M_initialize_dispatch(_Integer __int_n, _Integer __value, __true_type)
        {
-         this->_M_impl._M_start = _M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(
-               static_cast<size_type>(__n), _M_get_Tp_allocator()));
-         this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage =
-           this->_M_impl._M_start + static_cast<size_type>(__n);
-         _M_fill_initialize(static_cast<size_type>(__n), __value);
+         const size_type __n = static_cast<size_type>(__int_n);
+         pointer __start =
+           _M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(__n, _M_get_Tp_allocator()));
+         _Guard_alloc __guard(__start, __n, *this);
+         this->_M_impl._M_finish =
+           std::__uninitialized_fill_n_a<pointer, size_type, value_type>
+           (__start, __n, __value, _M_get_Tp_allocator());
+         this->_M_impl._M_start = __start;
+         (void) __guard._M_release();
+         this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage = __start + __n;
        }
 
       // Called by the range constructor to implement [23.1.1]/9
@@ -1690,17 +1720,17 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
                            std::forward_iterator_tag)
        {
          const size_type __n = std::distance(__first, __last);
-         this->_M_impl._M_start
-           = this->_M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(__n, _M_get_Tp_allocator()));
-         this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage = this->_M_impl._M_start + __n;
-         this->_M_impl._M_finish =
-           std::__uninitialized_copy_a(__first, __last,
-                                       this->_M_impl._M_start,
-                                       _M_get_Tp_allocator());
+         pointer __start =
+           this->_M_allocate(_S_check_init_len(__n, _M_get_Tp_allocator()));
+         _Guard_alloc __guard(__start, __n, *this);
+         this->_M_impl._M_finish = std::__uninitialized_copy_a
+           (__first, __last, __start, _M_get_Tp_allocator());
+         this->_M_impl._M_start = __start;
+         (void) __guard._M_release();
+         this->_M_impl._M_end_of_storage = __start + __n;
        }
 
-      // Called by the first initialize_dispatch above and by the
-      // vector(n,value,a) constructor.
+      // Called by the vector(n,value,a) constructor.
       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
       void
       _M_fill_initialize(size_type __n, const value_type& __value)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc 
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc
index 25df060beee..36b27dce7b9 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/vector.tcc
@@ -467,32 +467,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       pointer __new_start(this->_M_allocate(__len));
       pointer __new_finish(__new_start);
 
-      // RAII guard for allocated storage.
-      struct _Guard
       {
-       pointer _M_storage;         // Storage to deallocate
-       size_type _M_len;
-       _Tp_alloc_type& _M_alloc;
-
-       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-       _Guard(pointer __s, size_type __l, _Tp_alloc_type& __a)
-       : _M_storage(__s), _M_len(__l), _M_alloc(__a)
-       { }
-
-       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-       ~_Guard()
-       {
-         if (_M_storage)
-           __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Tp_alloc_type>::
-             deallocate(_M_alloc, _M_storage, _M_len);
-       }
-
-      private:
-       _Guard(const _Guard&);
-      };
-
-      {
-       _Guard __guard(__new_start, __len, _M_impl);
+       _Guard_alloc __guard(__new_start, __len, *this);
 
        // The order of the three operations is dictated by the C++11
        // case, where the moves could alter a new element belonging
@@ -596,32 +572,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
       pointer __new_start(this->_M_allocate(__len));
       pointer __new_finish(__new_start);
 
-      // RAII guard for allocated storage.
-      struct _Guard
       {
-       pointer _M_storage;         // Storage to deallocate
-       size_type _M_len;
-       _Tp_alloc_type& _M_alloc;
-
-       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-       _Guard(pointer __s, size_type __l, _Tp_alloc_type& __a)
-       : _M_storage(__s), _M_len(__l), _M_alloc(__a)
-       { }
-
-       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-       ~_Guard()
-       {
-         if (_M_storage)
-           __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Tp_alloc_type>::
-             deallocate(_M_alloc, _M_storage, _M_len);
-       }
-
-      private:
-       _Guard(const _Guard&);
-      };
-
-      {
-       _Guard __guard(__new_start, __len, _M_impl);
+       _Guard_alloc __guard(__new_start, __len, *this);
 
        // The order of the three operations is dictated by the C++11
        // case, where the moves could alter a new element belonging
@@ -833,32 +785,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
                _M_check_len(__n, "vector::_M_default_append");
              pointer __new_start(this->_M_allocate(__len));
 
-             // RAII guard for allocated storage.
-             struct _Guard
-             {
-               pointer _M_storage;         // Storage to deallocate
-               size_type _M_len;
-               _Tp_alloc_type& _M_alloc;
-
-               _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-               _Guard(pointer __s, size_type __l, _Tp_alloc_type& __a)
-               : _M_storage(__s), _M_len(__l), _M_alloc(__a)
-               { }
-
-               _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
-               ~_Guard()
-               {
-                 if (_M_storage)
-                   __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Tp_alloc_type>::
-                     deallocate(_M_alloc, _M_storage, _M_len);
-               }
-
-             private:
-               _Guard(const _Guard&);
-             };
-
              {
-               _Guard __guard(__new_start, __len, _M_impl);
+               _Guard_alloc __guard(__new_start, __len, *this);
 
                std::__uninitialized_default_n_a(__new_start + __size, __n,
                                                 _M_get_Tp_allocator());
diff --git 
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
index 6b3d48f0c92..d732ca8bed8 100644
--- 
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
+++ 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_1_neg.cc
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 // { dg-do compile }
 // { dg-prune-output "cannot convert" }
-// { dg-prune-output "no matching function .*_M_fill_initialize" }
+// { dg-prune-output "no matching function .*__uninitialized_fill_n_a" }
 
 #include <vector>
 
diff --git 
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
index 65ce2fd30e5..58c4c8f9a73 100644
--- 
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
+++ 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/vector/requirements/dr438/constructor_2_neg.cc
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 // { dg-do compile }
 // { dg-prune-output "cannot convert" }
-// { dg-prune-output "no matching function .*_M_fill_initialize" }
+// { dg-prune-output "no matching function .*__uninitialized_fill_n_a" }
 
 #include <vector>
 #include <utility>

Reply via email to