On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 20:50, Matthias Kretz <m.kr...@gsi.de> wrote: > > Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, arm-linux-gnueabihf, powerpc64le-linux-gnu, > x86_64-linux-gnu (-m64, -m32, -mx32), and arm-linux-gnueabi > > OK for trunk?
OK > And when backporting, should I squash it with the commit that > introduced the regression? I don't mind about that. If you cherry-pick them next to each other and push them at the same time, nobody's going to end up using the broken commit before the fix. It's fine to squash it if you prefer to though. OK for backports either way. > > -------------------- 8< ------------------- > > This resolves a regression on i686 that was introduced with > r15-429-gfb1649f8b4ad50. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <m.kr...@gsi.de> > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > PR libstdc++/114958 > * include/experimental/bits/simd.h (__as_vector): Don't use > vector_size(8) on __i386__. > (__vec_shuffle): Never return MMX vectors, widen to 16 bytes > instead. > (concat): Fix padding calculation to pick up widening logic from > __as_vector. > --- > libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/simd.h | 39 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > -- > ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── > Dr. Matthias Kretz https://mattkretz.github.io > GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research https://gsi.de > stdₓ::simd > ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
