On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
I just noticed this part. Rereading my comment in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033#c22
I haven't been able to make it break with -std=c++11 . Is there
something I'm missing here ?
I don't remember. It might just be that trying to create a constexpr
vector variable or calling __builtin_shuffle on it ICEs instead of giving
an error. I can keep a note to make some tests at the end of July (I will
be mostly away until then), but I believe the code from comment 22 is
safer than the one from comment 20, if memory serves.
--
Marc Glisse
