On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 5:29 PM Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 6/7/24 4:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > I've actually added it to my tester just to see if there's any fallout. > > It'll take a week to churn through the long running targets that > > bootstrap in QEMU, but the crosses should have data Monday. > The first round naturally didn't trigger anything because the option is > off by default. So I twiddled it to be on at -O1 and above. > > epiphany-elf ICEs in gen_rtx_SUBREG with the attached .i file compiled > with -O2: > > > root@577c7458c93a://home/jlaw/jenkins/workspace/epiphany-elf/epiphany-elf-obj/newlib/epiphany-elf/newlib/libm/complex# > > epiphany-elf-gcc -O2 libm_a-cacos.i > > during RTL pass: avoid_store_forwarding > > ../../../..//newlib-cygwin/newlib/libm/complex/cacos.c: In function 'cacos': > > ../../../..//newlib-cygwin/newlib/libm/complex/cacos.c:99:1: internal > > compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.cc:1032 > > 0x614538 gen_rtx_SUBREG(machine_mode, rtx_def*, poly_int<1u, unsigned long>) > > ../../..//gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.cc:1032 > > 0x614538 gen_rtx_SUBREG(machine_mode, rtx_def*, poly_int<1u, unsigned long>) > > ../../..//gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.cc:1030 > > 0xe82216 process_forwardings > > ../../..//gcc/gcc/avoid-store-forwarding.cc:273 > > 0xe82216 avoid_store_forwarding > > ../../..//gcc/gcc/avoid-store-forwarding.cc:489 > > 0xe82667 execute > > ../../..//gcc/gcc/avoid-store-forwarding.cc:558 > > > ft32-elf ICE'd in bitmap_check_index at various optimization levels: > > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O1 (internal compiler error: in > > bitmap_check_index, at sbitmap.h:104) > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O2 (internal compiler error: in > > bitmap_check_index, at sbitmap.h:104) > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error: in > > bitmap_check_index, at sbitmap.h:104) > > FAIL: execute/pr108498-2.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) > > > avr, c6x, > > lm32-elf failed to build libgcc with an ICE in leaf_function_p, I > haven't isolated that yet. > > > There were other failures as well. But you've got a few to start with > and we can retest pretty easily as the patch evolves. > Indeed ;) Thanks for reporting these!
Manolis > jeff >
