Updated patch.  This passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64le-linux
with no regressions.  Ok for trunk?

Changes from v1:
    1. Moved the disabling of shrink-wrapping to rs6000_emit_prologue
       and beefed up comment.  Used a more accurate test.
    2. Added comment to the test case on why rop_ok is needed.

Peter


rs6000: ROP - Do not disable shrink-wrapping for leaf functions [PR114759]

Only disable shrink-wrapping when using -mrop-protect when we know we
will be emitting the ROP-protect hash instructions (ie, non-leaf functions).

2024-06-17  Peter Bergner  <berg...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/
        PR target/114759
        * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_override_options_after_change): Move
        the disabling of shrink-wrapping from here....
        * config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc (rs6000_emit_prologue): ...to here.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR target/114759
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc             |  5 +++++
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc                   |  4 ----
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc 
b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
index 193e2122c0f..c384e48e378 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
@@ -3018,6 +3018,11 @@ rs6000_emit_prologue (void)
                            && (lookup_attribute ("no_split_stack",
                                                  DECL_ATTRIBUTES (cfun->decl))
                                == NULL));
+  /* If we are inserting ROP-protect hash instructions, disable shrink-wrap
+     until the bug where the hashst insn is emitted in the wrong location
+     is fixed.  See PR101324 for details.  */
+  if (info->rop_hash_size)
+    flag_shrink_wrap = 0;
 
   frame_pointer_needed_indeed
     = frame_pointer_needed && df_regs_ever_live_p (HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM);
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index e4dc629ddcc..fd6e013c346 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -3427,10 +3427,6 @@ rs6000_override_options_after_change (void)
     }
   else if (!OPTION_SET_P (flag_cunroll_grow_size))
     flag_cunroll_grow_size = flag_peel_loops || optimize >= 3;
-
-  /* If we are inserting ROP-protect instructions, disable shrink wrap.  */
-  if (rs6000_rop_protect)
-    flag_shrink_wrap = 0;
 }
 
 #ifdef TARGET_USES_LINUX64_OPT
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..579e08e920f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -mrop-protect 
-fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target rop_ok } Only enable on supported ABIs. */
+
+/* Verify we still attempt shrink-wrapping when using -mrop-protect
+   and there are no function calls.  */
+
+long
+foo (long arg)
+{
+  if (arg)
+    asm ("" ::: "r20");
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Performing shrink-wrapping" 1 
"pro_and_epilogue" } } */
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to