Hi,

I have found that this patch has introduced a regression in the arm-none-eabi 
toolchain for a testcase, which was previously passing:

PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/andnot-2.c scan-tree-dump-not forwprop3 "_expr"

The toolchain was built with:
Build = x86_64-none-linux-gnu
Host = x86_64-none-linux-gnu
Target = arm-none-eabi

This is also affecting the gcc-13 and gcc-14 branches.
Could you please let me know the impact of this regression, and whether you 
plan to fix the regression?


Kind regards,
Vasee

________________________________________
From: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Sent: 26 February 2024 07:42
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] middle-end/114070 - folding breaking VEC_COND expansion

The following properly guards the simplifications that move
operations into VEC_CONDs, in particular when that changes the
type constraints on this operation.

This needed a genmatch fix which was recording spurious implicit fors
when tcc_comparison is used in a C expression.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.

        PR middle-end/114070
        * genmatch.cc (parser::parse_c_expr): Do not record operand
        lists but only mark operators used.
        * match.pd ((c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e)  -->  c ? (a op d) : (b op e)):
        Properly guard the case of tcc_comparison changing the VEC_COND
        value operand type.

        * gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c: New testcase.
---
 gcc/genmatch.cc                         |  6 ++----
 gcc/match.pd                            | 15 ++++++++++++---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c

diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.cc b/gcc/genmatch.cc
index 375ae90ae6c..d9ae436ce5c 100644
--- a/gcc/genmatch.cc
+++ b/gcc/genmatch.cc
@@ -4760,10 +4760,8 @@ parser::parse_c_expr (cpp_ttype start)
            = (const char *)CPP_HASHNODE (token->val.node.node)->ident.str;
          if (strcmp (str, "return") == 0)
            fatal_at (token, "return statement not allowed in C expression");
-         id_base *idb = get_operator (str);
-         user_id *p;
-         if (idb && (p = dyn_cast<user_id *> (idb)) && p->is_oper_list)
-           record_operlist (token->src_loc, p);
+         /* Mark user operators corresponding to 'str' as used.  */
+         get_operator (str);
        }

       /* Record the token.  */
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index c5b6540f939..67007fc2017 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -5149,15 +5149,24 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
 /* (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e)  -->  c ? (a op d) : (b op e) */
  (simplify
   (op (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2) (vec_cond:s @0 @3 @4))
-  (vec_cond @0 (op! @1 @3) (op! @2 @4)))
+  (if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (op) != tcc_comparison
+       || types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1))
+       || expand_vec_cond_expr_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0), ERROR_MARK))
+   (vec_cond @0 (op! @1 @3) (op! @2 @4))))

 /* (c ? a : b) op d  -->  c ? (a op d) : (b op d) */
  (simplify
   (op (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2) @3)
-  (vec_cond @0 (op! @1 @3) (op! @2 @3)))
+  (if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (op) != tcc_comparison
+       || types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1))
+       || expand_vec_cond_expr_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0), ERROR_MARK))
+   (vec_cond @0 (op! @1 @3) (op! @2 @3))))
  (simplify
   (op @3 (vec_cond:s @0 @1 @2))
-  (vec_cond @0 (op! @3 @1) (op! @3 @2))))
+  (if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (op) != tcc_comparison
+       || types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@1))
+       || expand_vec_cond_expr_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0), ERROR_MARK))
+   (vec_cond @0 (op! @3 @1) (op! @3 @2)))))

 #if GIMPLE
 (match (nop_atomic_bit_test_and_p @0 @1 @4)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..cf46ec45a04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr114070.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-vect-cost-model" } */
+
+int unresolved(unsigned dirmask, unsigned mask, int *unresolved_n)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
+    mask |= 1;
+    if (!unresolved_n[i] || unresolved_n[i] & 70000)
+      dirmask |= 1;
+  }
+  return (dirmask == mask);
+}
--
2.35.3

Reply via email to