Hi Gerald,

> On 7 Jul 2024, at 19:26, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>> Here's a writeup of the AArch64 changes to highlight in GCC 14.1. If
>> there's something you'd like to highlight feel free to comment or add a
>> patch yourself. I don't expect the list to be exhaustive.
>> 
>> It's been a busy release for AArch64!
> 
> Indeed. Busy in a good way. :-)
> 
> How about the following simplification around generic-armv8-a and
> generic-armv8-a? I believe this version is easier to consume.
> 

Yeah, that does look smoother.
Ok. Thanks!
Kyrill

> (_Not_ pushed.)
> 
> Gerald
> 
> 
> diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
> index 9a1b0c8a..ca4cae0f 100644
> --- a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
> +++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
> @@ -687,11 +687,11 @@ You may also want to check out our
>       <li>Microsoft Cobalt-100 (<code>cobalt-100</code>).</li>
>     </ul></li>
>     <li>Additionally, the identifiers <code>generic</code>,
> -    <code>generic-armv8-a</code> and <code>generic-armv9-a</code> are added
> -    as arguments to <code>-mcpu=</code> and <code>-mtune=</code> to optimize
> -    code generation aimed at a good blend of CPUs of a particular 
> architecture
> -    version.  These tunings are also used as the default optimization targets
> -    when compiling with the <code>-march=armv8-a</code> or
> +    <code>generic-armv8-a</code> and <code>generic-armv9-a</code> can be
> +    used to optimize code generation for a good blend of CPUs of a
> +    particular architecture
> +    version.  These tunings are also used as the default optimization
> +    targets when compiling with the <code>-march=armv8-a</code> or
>     <code>-march=armv9-a</code> options and their point releases e.g.
>     <code>-march=armv8.2-a</code> or <code>-march=armv9.3-a</code>.</li>
> 

Reply via email to