> In the adjusted test it looks like the types of f and g match, so I wouldn't > expect an error.
Good point! Missing the forest for the trees. Anyways are the C++ patches ok with this change? Thanks, -Andi
> In the adjusted test it looks like the types of f and g match, so I wouldn't > expect an error.
Good point! Missing the forest for the trees. Anyways are the C++ patches ok with this change? Thanks, -Andi