On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers <g...@hazardy.de> wrote: > > Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100 > >> Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org > >> From: Björn Schäpers <g...@hazardy.de> > >> > >> Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > >>> In that case, you an call either GetModuleHandeExA or > >>> GetModuleHandeExW, the difference is minor. > >> > >> Here an updated version without relying on TEXT or TCHAR, directly calling > >> GetModuleHandleExW. > > > > Thanks, this LGTM (but I couldn't test it, I just looked at the > > sour ce code). > > Here an updated version. It is rebased on the combined approach of getting the > loaded DLLs and two minor changes to suppress warnings.
This bug report was filed about this patch: https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace/issues/131 > src\pecoff.c(86): error C2059: syntax error: '(' > src\pecoff.c(89): error C2059: syntax error: '(' > > It works fine if deleting CALLBACK and NTAPI. Any ideas? Thanks. Ian
