Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?

-- >8 --

When a partial specialization is deemed erroneous at parse time, we
currently flag the primary template as erroneous instead.  Later
at instantiation time we check if the primary template is erroneous
rather than the selected partial specialization, so at least we're
consistent.

But it's better not to conflate a partial specialization with the
primary template since they're instantiated independenty.  This avoids
rejecting the instantiation of A<int> in the below testcase.

        PR c++/116064

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * error.cc (get_current_template): If the current scope is
        a partial specialization, return it instead of the primary
        template.
        * pt.cc (instantiate_class_template): Pass the partial
        specialization if any to maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template
        instead of the primary template.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/error.cc                                   |  6 +++++-
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                                      |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C | 15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/error.cc b/gcc/cp/error.cc
index 6c22ff55b46..879e5a115cf 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/error.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/error.cc
@@ -173,7 +173,11 @@ get_current_template ()
 {
   if (scope_chain && in_template_context && !current_instantiation ())
     if (tree ti = get_template_info (current_scope ()))
-      return TI_TEMPLATE (ti);
+      {
+       if (PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (TI_TEMPLATE (ti)) && TI_PARTIAL_INFO (ti))
+         ti = TI_PARTIAL_INFO (ti);
+       return TI_TEMPLATE (ti);
+      }
 
   return NULL_TREE;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 542962b6387..3e55d5c0fea 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -12381,7 +12381,7 @@ instantiate_class_template (tree type)
   if (! push_tinst_level (type))
     return type;
 
-  maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template (templ);
+  maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template (t ? TI_TEMPLATE (t) : templ);
 
   int saved_unevaluated_operand = cp_unevaluated_operand;
   int saved_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..692e7c7ac82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/116064
+// { dg-additional-options -fpermissive }
+// Verify we correctly mark a partial specialization as erroneous
+// instead its primary template.
+
+template<class T>
+struct A { };
+
+template<class T>
+struct A<T*> { // { dg-error "instantiating erroneous template" }
+  void f(typename A::type); // { dg-warning "does not name a type" }
+};
+
+A<int> a;  // { dg-bogus "" }
+A<int*> b; // { dg-message "required from here" }
-- 
2.46.0.39.g891ee3b9db

Reply via email to