Jennifer Schmitz <jschm...@nvidia.com> writes:
> This patch implements constant folding for svdiv. If the predicate is
> ptrue or predication is _x, it uses vector_const_binop with
> aarch64_const_binop as callback and tree_code TRUNC_DIV_EXPR to fold constant
> integer operands.
> In aarch64_const_binop, a case was added for TRUNC_DIV_EXPR to return 0
> for division by 0, as defined in the semantics for svdiv.
> Tests were added to check the produced assembly for different
> predicates, signed and unsigned integers, and the svdiv_n_* case.
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu, no regression.
> OK for mainline?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jennifer Schmitz <jschm...@nvidia.com>
>
> gcc/
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc (svdiv_impl::fold):
>       Try constant folding.
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc (aarch64_const_binop):
>       Add special case for division by 0.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c: New test.
>
> From 92583732da28f6eb4a8db484fa3b24d55a7265e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jennifer Schmitz <jschm...@nvidia.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:04:51 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] SVE intrinsics: Fold constant operands for svdiv.
>
> This patch implements constant folding for svdiv. If the predicate is
> ptrue or predication is _x, it uses vector_const_binop with
> aarch64_const_binop as callback and tree_code TRUNC_DIV_EXPR to fold constant
> integer operands.
> In aarch64_const_binop, a case was added for TRUNC_DIV_EXPR to return 0
> for division by 0, as defined in the semantics for svdiv.
> Tests were added to check the produced assembly for different
> predicates, signed and unsigned integers, and the svdiv_n_* case.
>
> The patch was bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu, no regression.
> OK for mainline?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jennifer Schmitz <jschm...@nvidia.com>
>
> gcc/
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc (svdiv_impl::fold):
>       Try constant folding.
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc (aarch64_const_binop):
>       Add special case for division by 0.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c: New test.
> ---
>  .../aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc      |  19 +-
>  gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc    |   4 +
>  .../gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c | 336 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> index d55bee0b72f..617c7fc87e5 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins-base.cc
> @@ -755,8 +755,21 @@ public:
>    gimple *
>    fold (gimple_folder &f) const override
>    {
> -    tree divisor = gimple_call_arg (f.call, 2);
> -    tree divisor_cst = uniform_integer_cst_p (divisor);
> +    tree pg = gimple_call_arg (f.call, 0);
> +    tree op1 = gimple_call_arg (f.call, 1);
> +    tree op2 = gimple_call_arg (f.call, 2);
> +
> +    /* Try to fold constant integer operands.  */
> +    if (f.type_suffix (0).integer_p
> +     && (f.pred == PRED_x
> +         || is_ptrue (pg, f.type_suffix (0).element_bytes)))
> +      if (tree res = vector_const_binop (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR, op1, op2,
> +                                      aarch64_const_binop))
> +     return gimple_build_assign (f.lhs, res);

To reduce cut-&-paste, it'd be good to put this in a helper:

  gimple *gimple_folder::fold_const_binary (tree_code code);

that does the outermost "if" above for "code" rather than TRUNC_DIV_EXPR.
It could return null on failure.  Then the caller can just be:

  if (auto *res = f.fold_const_binary (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR))
    return res;

This could go right at the top of the function, since it doesn't rely
on any of the local variables above.

> +
> +    /* If the divisor is a uniform power of 2, fold to a shift
> +       instruction.  */
> +    tree divisor_cst = uniform_integer_cst_p (op2);
>  
>      if (!divisor_cst || !integer_pow2p (divisor_cst))
>        return NULL;
> @@ -770,7 +783,7 @@ public:
>                                   shapes::binary_uint_opt_n, MODE_n,
>                                   f.type_suffix_ids, GROUP_none, f.pred);
>       call = f.redirect_call (instance);
> -     tree d = INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (divisor)) ? divisor : divisor_cst;
> +     tree d = INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op2)) ? op2 : divisor_cst;
>       new_divisor = wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (d), tree_log2 (d));
>        }
>      else
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
> index 315d5ac4177..c1b28ebfe4e 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
> @@ -3444,6 +3444,10 @@ aarch64_const_binop (enum tree_code code, tree arg1, 
> tree arg2)
>        signop sign = TYPE_SIGN (type);
>        wi::overflow_type overflow = wi::OVF_NONE;
>  
> +      /* Return 0 for division by 0.  */
> +      if (code == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR && integer_zerop (arg2))
> +     return arg2;
> +      
>        if (!poly_int_binop (poly_res, code, arg1, arg2, sign, &overflow))
>          return NULL_TREE;
>        return force_fit_type (type, poly_res, false,
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..062fb6e560e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/const_fold_div_1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +#include "arm_sve.h"
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (pg, svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg_0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.b, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg_0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (pg, svdup_s64 (0), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg_by0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.b, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg_by0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (pg, svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (0));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (pg, svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg_0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg_0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (pg, svdup_s64 (0), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg_by0:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+)\.b, #0
> +**   sdivr   \2\.d, p[0-7]/m, \2\.d, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg_by0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (pg, svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (0));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_m_pg:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #3
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   sdiv    \2, p[0-7]/m, \2, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_m_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_m (pg, svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_m_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_m_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_m (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), svdup_s64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_x (pg, svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg_n_s64_0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.b, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg_n_s64_0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_x (pg, svdup_s64 (0), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_pg_n_s64_by0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.b, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_pg_n_s64_by0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_x (pg, svdup_s64 (5), 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_z (pg, svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg_n_s64_0:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #0
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg_n_s64_0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_z (pg, svdup_s64 (0), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_pg_n_s64_by0:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+)\.b, #0
> +**   sdivr   \2\.d, p[0-7]/m, \2\.d, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_pg_n_s64_by0 (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_z (pg, svdup_s64 (5), 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_m_pg_n:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #3
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   sdiv    \2, p[0-7]/m, \2, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_m_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_m (pg, svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_x_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_x_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_x (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_z_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_z_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_z (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** s64_m_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svint64_t s64_m_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_s64_m (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_s64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_x_pg:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_x_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (pg, svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_z_pg:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_z_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (pg, svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_m_pg:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #3
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   udiv    \2, p[0-7]/m, \2, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_m_pg (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_m (pg, svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_x_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_x_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_x (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_z_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_z_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_z (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_m_ptrue:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_m_ptrue ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_m (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), svdup_u64 (3));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_x_pg_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_x_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_x (pg, svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_z_pg_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, p[0-7]/z, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_z_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_z (pg, svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_m_pg_n:
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #3
> +**   mov     (z[0-9]+\.d), #5
> +**   udiv    \2, p[0-7]/m, \2, \1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_m_pg_n (svbool_t pg)
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_m (pg, svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_x_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_x_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_x (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_z_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_z_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_z (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> +** u64_m_ptrue_n:
> +**   mov     z[0-9]+\.d, #1
> +**   ret
> +*/
> +svuint64_t u64_m_ptrue_n ()
> +{
> +  return svdiv_n_u64_m (svptrue_b64 (), svdup_u64 (5), 3);
> +}

These are good tests, but maybe we could throw in a small number
of svdupq tests as well, to test for non-uniform cases.  E.g.:

  svdiv_s32_m (svptrue_b32 (), svdupq_s32 (3, 0, -5, 11), svdupq_s32 (4, 1, -6, 
0));

which hopefully should get optimised to zero.

Similarly:

  svdiv_s32_z (svptrue_b32 (), svdupq_s32 (6, -30, 100, -4), svdupq_s32 (-3, 
15, -50, 2));

should get optimised to -2.

Looks good to me otherwise.

Thanks,
Richard

Reply via email to