On 29 June 2012 14:48, Dmitry Melnik <d...@ispras.ru> wrote:
>
> On 06/27/2012 07:55 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> I must admit that I had been suggesting to Zhenqiang about turning
>> this off by tightening the movsi_insn predicates rather than adding a
>> split, but given that it appears to produce enough benefit in this
>> case I don't have any reasons to object ...
>>
>> However it's interesting that this doesn't seem to help vpr ....
>
> We retested vpr, but it just seems to be unstable:

Unfortunate but ok.

Ramana

Reply via email to