From: Eric Botcazou <[email protected]>
The problem occurs when the component type is a record type with default
values for the initialization procedure of the (base) array type, because
the compiler is trying to generate a full access for a parameter of the
base array type, which does not make sense.
gcc/ada/ChangeLog:
PR ada/116551
* gcc-interface/trans.cc (node_is_atomic) <N_Identifier>: Return
false if the type of the entity is an unconstrained array type.
(node_is_volatile_full_access) <N_Identifier>: Likewise.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on master.
---
gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.cc | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.cc b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.cc
index 7728e60ccb6..93f67404ddb 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.cc
+++ b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/trans.cc
@@ -4263,7 +4263,10 @@ node_is_atomic (Node_Id gnat_node)
if (!Is_Object (gnat_entity))
break;
return Is_Atomic (gnat_entity)
+ /* Disregard the flag on unconstrained arrays or simple constants
+ since we cannot or need not generate an atomic access. */
|| (Is_Atomic (Etype (gnat_entity))
+ && Ekind (Etype (gnat_entity)) != E_Array_Type
&& !simple_constant_p (gnat_entity));
case N_Selected_Component:
@@ -4303,7 +4306,10 @@ node_is_volatile_full_access (Node_Id gnat_node)
if (!Is_Object (gnat_entity))
break;
return Is_Volatile_Full_Access (gnat_entity)
+ /* Disregard the flag on unconstrained arrays or simple constants
+ since we cannot or need not generate a full access. */
|| (Is_Volatile_Full_Access (Etype (gnat_entity))
+ && Ekind (Etype (gnat_entity)) != E_Array_Type
&& !simple_constant_p (gnat_entity));
case N_Selected_Component:
--
2.43.0
