On reflection, I'm not so sure about these anymore:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:26:47PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> + switch (extern int i = 0); /* { dg-error "in condition|both .extern. and
> initializer" } */
I think this is definitely valid.
> + switch (register int i = 0); /* { dg-error "in condition" } */
> + switch (static int i = 0); /* { dg-error "in condition" } */
> + switch (thread_local int i = 0); /* { dg-error "in
> condition|function-scope" } */
All three may be valid, actually.
> + switch (typedef int i); /* { dg-error "in condition|initializer" } */
> + switch (typedef int i = 0); /* { dg-error "in condition|initialized" } */
Both remain invalid.
Joseph, let me know if you agree, and I'll adjust the patch. Thanks.
Marek
