On Jul 13, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:36:35AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
>> I just checked all in tree gcc targets, and none claim OImode support.
> 
> ./s390/s390-modes.def:23:INT_MODE (OI, 32);
> ./spu/spu-modes.def:29:INT_MODE (OI, 32);
> ./ia64/ia64-modes.def:68:INT_MODE (OI, 32);
> ./i386/i386-modes.def:88:INT_MODE (OI, 32);
> ./arm/arm-modes.def:82:INT_MODE (OI, 32);

Now, go back and check the target to see if they return true for:

@deftypefn {Target Hook} bool TARGET_SCALAR_MODE_SUPPORTED_P (enum machine_mode 
@var{mode})
Define this to return nonzero if the port is prepared to handle
insns involving scalar mode @var{mode}.  For a scalar mode to be
considered supported, all the basic arithmetic and comparisons
must work.

The default version of this hook returns true for any mode
required to handle the basic C types (as defined by the port).
Included here are the double-word arithmetic supported by the
code in @file{optabs.c}.
@end deftypefn

I'll wait.  You'll notice that my patch uses that answer to determine if 
support for __int256 is enabled.

Reply via email to