On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > On 11 Jul 2012, at 00:01, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> Anyway, although i686-Darwin 8 is sadly in need of some TLC, the proposed >> patch causes no regressions. >> ppc-darwin 8 tests are still running, but it bootstrapped (500M G4, > 24hrs >> for c/c++ build & test). > > FAOD, from a testing perspective this is fine - but it needs Mike's OK,
Hum, no, it doesn't, it has already been approved by Paolo, and I don't disagree with that approval.... :-)
