Hi,
the test fails with _zvfh because we vectorize more. Just adjust the
test expectations. I regtested this a while ago on rv64gcv_zvl512b.
Will commit as obvious if the CI is happy.
Regards
Robin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c:
Distinguish between zvfh and !zvfh.
---
.../riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c
index de5a5ed7d56..698f0091390 100644
---
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c
+++
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/gather_load_64-12-zvbb.c
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ TEST_LOOP (_Float16, uint64_t)
TEST_LOOP (float, uint64_t)
TEST_LOOP (double, uint64_t)
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops in function" 80
"vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops in function" 80
"vect" { target { ! riscv_zvfh } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops in function" 88
"vect" { target riscv_zvfh } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " \.MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD" "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \.GATHER_LOAD" "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \.MASK_GATHER_LOAD" "vect" } } */
--
2.47.1
