> I added the negative step check just some weeks ago and I'd see it as > simplification to remove the restriction again if you're touching the actual > step anyway. So I wouldn't worry about stage 4 in that regard.
Oh, I see. I'll have a try after this bug fix. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Robin Dapp <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 7:44 PM To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Robin Dapp <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Fix bug for expand_const_vector interleave [PR118931] > I don't explore more cases here consider we are in stage 4. I think the > expand_const_vector need some refactor up to a point. I added the negative step check just some weeks ago and I'd see it as simplification to remove the restriction again if you're touching the actual step anyway. So I wouldn't worry about stage 4 in that regard. -- Regards Robin
