Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
-- 8< --
Here gimplification got confused because extend_temps_r messed up the types
of the arms of a COND_EXPR.
PR c++/119073
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.cc (extend_temps_r): Preserve types of COND_EXPR arms.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/call.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index be9b0cf62f1..f7b4cccb1c7 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -14902,7 +14902,7 @@ extend_temps_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void
*data)
{
tree set = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
cur_cond_guard, boolean_true_node);
- op = add_stmt_to_compound (set, op);
+ op = cp_build_compound_expr (set, op, tf_none);
}
};
walk_arm (TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 1));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ebb6acafe7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/range-for39.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/119073
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A { ~A (); };
+struct B { B (const A &a = A ()); int *begin (); int *end (); ~B (); };
+
+void
+foo (bool x)
+{
+ for (auto i : (x ? B{} : B{}))
+ ;
+}
base-commit: 8d7762945bba3c8321b5856cee3d5e5aed55facf
--
2.48.1