Hi,
Ok to push if bootstrap and regtest (on x86_64 linux) succeeds?
Thanks,
Filip Kastl
-- 8< --
I increment the index variable in a loop even when I do
vec::unordered_remove() which causes the vector traversal to miss some
elements. Mikael notified me of this mistake I made in my last patch.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc (scc_copy_prop::propagate): Don't
increment after vec::unordered_remove().
Reported-by: Mikael Morin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filip Kastl <[email protected]>
---
gcc/gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc
index 298feb05571..ee2a7fa8a72 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc
@@ -582,9 +582,11 @@ scc_copy_prop::propagate ()
get removed. That means parts of CFG get removed. Those may
contain copy statements. For that reason we prune SCCs here. */
unsigned i;
- for (i = 0; i < scc.length (); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < scc.length ();)
if (gimple_bb (scc[i]) == NULL)
scc.unordered_remove (i);
+ else
+ i++;
if (scc.is_empty ())
{
scc.release ();
--
2.47.1