On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2012-08-10 12:59, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> Actually, this is the problem you are trying to solve. The fma4 >> patterns are defined before fma3, so gcc prefers these. > > The Real Problem is that they should not be separate patterns. > They should be a single pattern that selects alternatives via > the enabled isa.
Yes, I am just writing the patch ;) Do you think that enabled isa is also appropriate for 4.7? Uros.
