Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving <complex>
On 10 August 2012 20:17, Marc Glisse wrote: > Ping > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html > > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> here is a patch for PR54112. It does 2 things: >> * #undef complex after including the system's complex.h >> * in C++11, still include the system's complex.h >> >> The C++11 standard says that including complex.h is equivalent to >> including <complex>, with the rationale that a C++ compiler can't parse a >> C99 complex.h header. However, g++, as an extension, handles _Complex, so it >> makes sense to also provide the prototypes for cacos and other C99 complex >> math functions. >> >> Tested, no regression. >> >> (Cc: Benjamin, who wrote the header) >> >> 2012-07-28 Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> >> >> PR libstdc++/54112 >> * include/c_compatibility/complex.h: Undefine complex, always >> include system's complex.h if present. >> * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/c99.cc: New testcase. >> * testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/complex.cc: Likewise. > > > -- > Marc Glisse
