On Mon, 23 Jun 2025, Tamar Christina wrote:

> Consider the loop
> 
> void f1 (int *restrict a, int n)
> {
> #pragma GCC unroll 4 requested
>   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
>     a[i] *= 2;
> }
> 
> Which today is vectorized and then unrolled 3x by the RTL unroller due to the
> use of the pragma.  This is unfortunate because the pragma was intended for 
> the
> scalar loop but we end up with an unrolled vector loop and a longer path to 
> the
> entry which has a low enough VF requirement to enter.
> 
> This patch instead seeds the suggested_unroll_factor with the value the user
> requested and instead uses it to maintain the total VF that the user wanted 
> the
> scalar loop to maintain.
> 
> In effect it applies the unrolling inside the vector loop itself.  This has 
> the
> benefits for things like reductions, as it allows us to split the accumulator
> and so the unrolled loop is more efficient.  For early-break it allows the
> cbranch call to be shared between the unrolled elements, giving you more
> effective unrolling because it doesn't need the repeated cbranch which can be
> expensive.
> 
> The target can then choose to create multiple epilogues to deal with the 
> "rest".
> 
> The example above now generates:
> 
> .L4:
>         ldr     q31, [x2]
>         add     v31.4s, v31.4s, v31.4s
>         str     q31, [x2], 16
>         cmp     x2, x3
>         bne     .L4
> 
> as V4SI maintains the requested VF, but e.g. pragma unroll 8 generates:
> 
> .L4:
>         ldp     q30, q31, [x2]
>         add     v30.4s, v30.4s, v30.4s
>         add     v31.4s, v31.4s, v31.4s
>         stp     q30, q31, [x2], 32
>         cmp     x3, x2
>         bne     .L4
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu,
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> -m32, -m64 and no issues.
> 
> Ok for master?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * doc/extend.texi: Document pragma unroll interaction with vectorizer.
>       * tree-vectorizer.h (LOOP_VINFO_USER_UNROLL): New.
>       (class _loop_vec_info): Add user_unroll.
>       * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_analyze_loop_1): Set
>       suggested_unroll_factor and retry.
>       (_loop_vec_info::_loop_vec_info): Initialize user_unroll.
>       (vect_transform_loop): Clear the loop->unroll value if the pragma was
>       used.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/unroll-vect.c: New test.
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> index 
> 69c6512074642ece47f1f9a3d7bdde20ec800d40..7da99f77ec82b23f7a79558f3a0fa98b208f8283
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> @@ -10382,6 +10382,11 @@ loop or a @code{#pragma GCC ivdep}, and applies only 
> to the loop that follows.
>  @var{n} is an integer constant expression specifying the unrolling factor.
>  The values of @math{0} and @math{1} block any unrolling of the loop.
>  
> +If the loop was vectorized the unroll factor specified will be used to seed 
> the
> +vectorizer unroll factor.  Whether the loop is unrolled or not will be
> +determined by target costing.  The resulting vectorized loop may still be
> +unrolled more in later passes depending on the target costing.
> +
>  @end table
>  
>  @node Thread-Local
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/unroll-vect.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/unroll-vect.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3cb774ba95787ebee488fbe7306299ef28e6bb35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/unroll-vect.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O3 -march=armv8-a --param 
> aarch64-autovec-preference=asimd-only -std=gnu99" } */
> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
> +
> +/*
> +** f1:
> +**   ...
> +**   add     v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
> +**   add     v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
> +**   add     v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
> +**   add     v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.4s
> +**   ...
> +*/
> +void f1 (int *restrict a, int n)
> +{
> +#pragma GCC unroll 16
> +  for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
> +    a[i] *= 2;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> index 
> 9ac4d7e5f7a099a7039cd4186666cf64328b8ee6..44f304b6e3766d43d388599b6a80ab9e8e3123ef
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,7 @@ _loop_vec_info::_loop_vec_info (class loop *loop_in, 
> vec_info_shared *shared)
>      peeling_for_gaps (false),
>      peeling_for_niter (false),
>      early_breaks (false),
> +    user_unroll (false),
>      no_data_dependencies (false),
>      has_mask_store (false),
>      scalar_loop_scaling (profile_probability::uninitialized ()),
> @@ -3428,27 +3429,50 @@ vect_analyze_loop_1 (class loop *loop, 
> vec_info_shared *shared,
>                    res ? "succeeded" : "failed",
>                    GET_MODE_NAME (loop_vinfo->vector_mode));
>  
> -  if (res && !LOOP_VINFO_EPILOGUE_P (loop_vinfo) && suggested_unroll_factor 
> > 1)
> +  auto user_unroll = LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo)->unroll;
> +  if (res && !LOOP_VINFO_EPILOGUE_P (loop_vinfo)
> +      /* Check to see if the user wants to unroll or if the target wants to. 
>  */
> +      && (suggested_unroll_factor > 1 || user_unroll > 1))
>      {
> -      if (dump_enabled_p ())
> -     dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
> +      if (suggested_unroll_factor == 1)
> +     {
> +       int assumed_vf = vect_vf_for_cost (loop_vinfo);
> +       suggested_unroll_factor = user_unroll / assumed_vf;
> +       if (suggested_unroll_factor > 1)
> +         {
> +           if (dump_enabled_p ())
> +             dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
> +                      "setting unroll factor to %d based on user requested "
> +                      "unroll factor %d and suggested vectorization "
> +                      "factor: %d\n",
> +                      suggested_unroll_factor, user_unroll, assumed_vf);
> +         }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (suggested_unroll_factor > 1)
> +       {
> +         if (dump_enabled_p ())
> +           dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
>                        "***** Re-trying analysis for unrolling"
>                        " with unroll factor %d and slp %s.\n",
>                        suggested_unroll_factor,
>                        slp_done_for_suggested_uf ? "on" : "off");
> -      loop_vec_info unroll_vinfo
> -     = vect_create_loop_vinfo (loop, shared, loop_form_info, NULL);
> -      unroll_vinfo->vector_mode = vector_mode;
> -      unroll_vinfo->suggested_unroll_factor = suggested_unroll_factor;
> -      opt_result new_res = vect_analyze_loop_2 (unroll_vinfo, fatal, NULL,
> -                                             slp_done_for_suggested_uf);
> -      if (new_res)
> -     {
> -       delete loop_vinfo;
> -       loop_vinfo = unroll_vinfo;
> -     }
> -      else
> -     delete unroll_vinfo;
> +         loop_vec_info unroll_vinfo
> +             = vect_create_loop_vinfo (loop, shared, loop_form_info, NULL);
> +         unroll_vinfo->vector_mode = vector_mode;
> +         unroll_vinfo->suggested_unroll_factor = suggested_unroll_factor;
> +         opt_result new_res
> +             = vect_analyze_loop_2 (unroll_vinfo, fatal, NULL,
> +                                    slp_done_for_suggested_uf);
> +         if (new_res)
> +           {
> +             delete loop_vinfo;
> +             loop_vinfo = unroll_vinfo;
> +             LOOP_VINFO_USER_UNROLL (loop_vinfo) = user_unroll > 1;
> +           }
> +         else
> +           delete unroll_vinfo;
> +       }
>      }
>  
>    /* Remember the autodetected vector mode.  */
> @@ -12041,6 +12065,13 @@ vect_transform_loop (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, 
> gimple *loop_vectorized_call)
>       dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "Disabling unrolling due to"
>                        " variable-length vectorization factor\n");
>      }
> +
> +  /* When we have unrolled the loop due to a user requested value we should
> +     leave it up to the RTL unroll heuristics to determine if it's still 
> worth
> +     while to unroll more.  */
> +  if (LOOP_VINFO_USER_UNROLL (loop_vinfo))
> +    loop->unroll = 0;
> +
>    /* Free SLP instances here because otherwise stmt reference counting
>       won't work.  */
>    slp_instance instance;
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
> index 
> 7aa2b02b63cb88a61b88295c43d4325ee487c619..5351e1aee44fb3b9a75c13940b5d239fb48871cb
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
> @@ -970,6 +970,10 @@ public:
>    /* Main loop IV cond.  */
>    gcond* loop_iv_cond;
>  
> +  /* True if we have an unroll factor requested by the user through pragma 
> GCC
> +     unroll.  */
> +  bool user_unroll;
> +
>    /* True if there are no loop carried data dependencies in the loop.
>       If loop->safelen <= 1, then this is always true, either the loop
>       didn't have any loop carried data dependencies, or the loop is being
> @@ -1094,6 +1098,7 @@ public:
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_CHECK_UNEQUAL_ADDRS(L)  (L)->check_unequal_addrs
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_CHECK_NONZERO(L)        (L)->check_nonzero
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_LOWER_BOUNDS(L)         (L)->lower_bounds
> +#define LOOP_VINFO_USER_UNROLL(L)          (L)->user_unroll
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_GROUPED_STORES(L)       (L)->grouped_stores
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_SLP_INSTANCES(L)        (L)->slp_instances
>  #define LOOP_VINFO_SLP_UNROLLING_FACTOR(L) (L)->slp_unrolling_factor
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to