On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 2:02 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 9:12 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > While working on > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881 > > > > I tried to use check-function-bodies to verify that > > > > 1: call mcount > > > > generated by "-pg" is placed at the function entry. Add "^[0-9]+:" to > > check-function-bodies to allow: > > > > 1: call mcount > > > > PR testsuite/120881 > > * lib/scanasm.exp (check-function-bodies): Allow "^[0-9]+:". > > > > OK for master? > > > > Any comments on this simple change: > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp > index 97935cb23c3..a2311de5704 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/scanasm.exp > @@ -1109,6 +1109,8 @@ proc check-function-bodies { args } { > append function_regexp ".*" > } elseif { [regexp {^\.L} $line] } { > append function_regexp $line "\n" > + } elseif { [regexp {^[0-9]+:} $line] } { > + append function_regexp $line "\n" > } else { > append function_regexp $config(line_prefix) $line "\n" > } > > This blocks other patches I am working on. >
If there are no objections, I will check these 2 line changes next week to fix: +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-10.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-11.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-12.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-4.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-5.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-6.c check-function-bodies foo +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120936-8.c check-function-bodies foo on x86. -- H.J.
