On Thu, 17 Jul 2025, Filip Kastl wrote:

> On Thu 2025-07-17 10:00:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025, Filip Kastl wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This patch cuts out the solver from tree-ssa-structalias.cc.  Soon, I'd 
> > > like to
> > > also cut out the part that generates constraints and perhaps also other 
> > > parts.
> > > 
> > > My big goal is to implement Steensgaard-style points-to analysis and use 
> > > it
> > > interprocedurally.  Unlike the IPA-PTA we currently have, Steensgaard 
> > > should be
> > > fast enough to be enabled by default.  Once this matures a bit, my hope 
> > > is that
> > > this could enable GCC to optimize in many interesting cases where it 
> > > didn't
> > > have enough alias information before.  But that is a very long-term 
> > > vision.
> > > 
> > > Cutting tree-ssa-structalias.cc into smaller files is preparatory work.
> > > Even ignoring the upcoming changes, cutting a file of this size into 
> > > smaller
> > > files seems like a good idea to me.  I believe it will improve 
> > > readability.
> > > It will also be clearer what I'm modifying in each of the upcoming IPA-PTA
> > > patches.  For example, I'm not planning to modify the existing solver at 
> > > all.
> > > The splitting will also make it easier to eventually plug in the new
> > > Steensgaard solver.
> > > 
> > > I've tried to make as few changes as seemed reasonable.  I go into more 
> > > detail
> > > about how I did the splitting in the commit message.
> > > 
> > > I've named the new files *-andersen.{cc,h} because the current solver 
> > > would be
> > > refered to as Andersen-style in points-to analysis literature.  When I'll 
> > > be
> > > adding the Steensgard-style solver, I'm planning to call those files
> > > *-steens.{cc,h}.
> > > 
> > > Btw, I copied the license comment at the top of tree-ssa-structalias.cc 
> > > into
> > > all the files I created.  This means that it says "Copyright (C) 
> > > 2005-2025" in
> > > files which were just created.  Is that ok?
> > > 
> > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64.  Ok to push?
> > 
> > I'm OK with splitting up the file, but can we get rid of
> > 'tree' and 'structalias'?  I'd say ssa-pta or for the solver,
> > which has nothing to do with SSA, use pta-andersen.{cc,h} instead?
> > At least for the new file, don't rename the old one.
> 
> Yes, I'm all for that.  I thought about doing that in a later patch but I 
> guess
> it will be nicer to do that now.
> 
> > That extends to the choice of the namespace name as well (I'd use 'pta').
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > The constraint building is mostly gimple based (it doesn't use SSA),
> > so gimple-pta-constraints.{cc,h} might be appropriate and the pass
> > itself would be ssa-pta.{cc,h} since it puts the solutions on SSA
> > vars only. 
> 
> You say we should keep tree-ssa-structalias.cc and that the pass (the alias,
> ealias and ipa-pta passes, right?) should be in ssa-pta.{cc,h}.  So you 
> suggest
> splitting out the pass classes into ssa-pta.{cc,h}?  I'm confused about which
> parts you think should then be in tree-ssa-structalias.cc and which in
> ssa-pta.cc.

For now those pieces would remain in tree-ssa-structalias.cc.  After all
reorg is complete we'd move that to ssa-pta.{cc,h}.  So I suggest to
defer this part until it gets clear how this all plays out.

> Also, why not also rename tree-ssa-structalias.cc to be consistent?  Is it a
> no-no to rename old files?

See above.

> If we ignored the fact that the constraint building doesn't really interact
> with SSA (but AFAIU, it benefits from SSA) and that the passes don't really
> modify gimple statements, we could have:
> 
> pta-andersen.{cc,h}
> pta-steens.{cc,h}
> gimple-ssa-pta-constraints.{cc,h}
> gimple-ssa-pta.{cc,h}
> 
> That seems nicer to me.  A justification for calling those files gimple-ssa-*
> could be "to convey that this analysis happens on GIMPLE SSA IR".  But you are
> the boss, of course.

Sure, that works for me and follows existing practice.

> Btw, I also thought about renaming the passes.  ipa-pta is fine.  But ealias
> and alias could be called epta and pta.  That would convey what they are
> actually doing better, I think.  It would also be more consistent with file
> names.

Yeah, but that's a separate change affecting dump file names and
-fdisable-tree-XYZ only.

Richard.

> Cheers,
> Filip Kastl
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to