On 16 August 2012 21:28, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:59:09PM +0200, Simon Baldwin wrote: > > On 16 August 2012 16:40, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > ,,, > > > > > > Do you have considered to use a new option flag (usable in the .opt files) > > > instead of a langhook? I.e. add a flag cl_dont_record to cl_option, a > > > string Norecord for the .opt files, some handling for it in > > > opt-functions.awk and the like? > > > > > > Adding lang-hooks used by debug producers make me twitch :) > > > > Okay. Below is an alternative approach. > > > > I've moved discussion to gcc-patches, since it's now more concrete > > than abstract. > > You could have just added > case OPT_cpp_: > to the switch in gen_producer_string, instead of all this.
Thanks. I was under the impression, apparently mistaken, that OPT_cpp_ exists only if fortran is enabled. -- Google UK Limited | Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | Registered in England Number: 3977902
