On 7/18/25 8:49 PM, pan2...@intel.com wrote:
From: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
The previous test case doesn't leverage the right test helper macro,
it should be DEF_AVG_0_WRAP instead of DEF_AVG_0. We prefer the
test function name is test_avg_floor_int64_t_int32_t_0 instead
of test_avg_floor_WT_NT_0 for DEF_AVG_0(WT, NT).
The below test suites are passed for this patch.
* The rv64gcv fully regression test.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i16-from-i32.c:
Leverage DEF_AVG_0_WRAP to generate the correct func name.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i16-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i32-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i64-from-i128.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i8-from-i16.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i8-from-i32.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_floor-1-i8-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i16-from-i32.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i16-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i32-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i8-from-i16.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i8-from-i32.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i8-from-i64.c: Ditto.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/avg_ceil-1-i64-from-i128.c: Ditto.
OK
jeff
